Hi, anyone noticed that there is a little difference with the output sensordata
from the Matlab function kspaceFirstOrder3D and its C++ version kspaceFirstOrder3DC?
It can be tested with example_us_bmode_linear_transducer.m
. It can be found there is a time shift between the Matlab and C++ waveform, and the transmitting waveform ( the header of the receiving waveform) are not the same. Maybe due to the function of the transducer.combine_sensor_data
?
For the finial B-mode image, the background level of C++ is a little higher than that of Matlab's.